Category: Stocks
February 24th, 2009
General Motors
Published on February 24th, 2009 @ 06:40:54 pm , using 641 words, 1047 views
I know it may seem silly to seriously consider buying GM-shares at this time, but a company that has lost so much value in such a short time should at least be reviewed... maybe the selling is overdone. Since october 2007 GM has lost about 95% of the mcap, and this means that to get back to that level GM would have to go up almost 2000%!

Could they fall further? The mcap today is not more than about $1bn, which isn't alot for a company with huge holdings (assets valued at about $30bn) and (still) huge sales of cars. The problem isn't that people aren't buying cars, the problem is that growth is shrinking... there's a big difference there. US-deliveries of vehicles in january was 129,227, down 49% from a year ago. That is a big drop, but they're still selling cars. Obviously they are going to have to change alot of things, for example the latest reported profit margin stood at -13.24%! But, hard economic times could be a great thing for a company like GM, the shake-up might bring in some new people and force management to do some long needed restructuring and re-thinking.
The latest reported balance sheet showed a total cash-holding of $15.9bn and a total debt of $45.16bn. Since the company is in a very shaky position I'm not going to bother trying to analyze the cash-flow or profitability. But what we can fairly easily see is that if GM does make it through the next few years without too great losses and if they are able to adjust properly it could easily make a stellar rise when things start turning around.
Although Bush-Obama have been very willing to throw away hundreds of billions to corrupt and incompetent bankers who in no way deserve it, maybe there is a chance that GM could also see some bail-out money, and not just a building up of loans. If they do get money this way that would obviously make things easier for the company. I strongly doubt that GM will fail, it is simply too big and has a too large productivity to be allowed to fail, not only for political reasons, but for sound economic reasons - they are selling lots of cars and they have a huge operation going, the right people with the right ideas could easily turn it into a money-making machine in a couple of years.
So, should one buy GM-shares today? I think that it is likely that the profit margin will improve somewhat over the coming year, even if sales keep falling and everything looks very bleak. Management is forced to do whatever they can to stop the company from bleeding right now. This could mean a number of things, maybe huge lay-offs and selling of assets and shutting down of research, but eventually I think they will turn it around.
Basically, if you were to buy today you would have to go through some really shaky times, but then you'd be on first row to watch the rocket take off whenever that might happen. And how much further could they really fall? Right now they're so cheap that anyone with a billion to spare could buy the whole thing... would you buy GM if you had a billion bucks? yes, maybe I would; I could turn one of their huge factories into my private luxury-villa.
edit: I'm sorry, I wrote the article a little too quickly and forgot to mention that the net tangible assets are actually -$60bn. This changes the picture, but I still think that considering the profits that the company has shown in the past it can get back to similar levels... however it won't be easy. If profitability came back to the levels of a few years ago, then that negative asset could turn positive in a few years.
February 23rd, 2009
Lappland Goldminers and Northern Lion Gold Corp
Published on February 23rd, 2009 @ 17:47:32 , using 779 words, 1029 views
This post was actually meant to cover Lappland Goldminers (LG), however I discovered an interesting 'relation' with Northern Lion Gold (NLG), so therefore I will very briefly cover them as well.
First off, LG is listed on the Stockholm First North, quote GOLD. Only two months ago was LG a pure exploration company (active in Sweden and Finland), but during these last two months they've started up two gold-mines. Some people outside of the nordic countries may have heard of the company as their Fäboliden gold-discovery is one of the largest in Europe. Fäboliden is also the main-project of the company. Fäboliden is located on the (relatively recently discovered) so-called gold line in northern Sweden, which stretches all across Sweden (south-east) into Finland (australian Dragon Mining is active here as well). LG has plenty of other projects on the gold line and some are very close to Fäboliden, whereto ore will be transported into a very large processing facility which is under construction (although in very early stage). The ore-reserve of Fäboliden is today about 2.4M ounces of gold (indicated and inferred - cut-off 0.4g/t) and is still open. The ore-grade is about 1.5g/t, but recent test mining revealed a grade of 3.4g/t, so the ore-grade might have been underestimated (but that remains uncertain) - and one should not completely discount the accompanying silver in the ore which is at a 1:3 ratio over gold. The planned Fäboliden mine will be open-pit at first and then extend under ground as the deposit is mostly open at depth and also appears to host greater ore-grades at depth. There are 14 other projects on the gold line in vicinity of Fäboliden, most of which have shown very interesting results (drill-cores with some grades much higher than Fäboliden - example: 5m of 4,15g/t at Tjålmträsk), but are still in fairly early stages; it is looking very likely however that these projects will be holding considerable resources to be transported to Fäboliden as the ore there starts to run out.
The Finnish part of the gold line is envisioned to have about the same set-up as in Sweden, where today the largest project is the Haveri (which was bought from NLG). Haveri has a resource of about 300,000 ounces of gold at 1.37g/t today. Haveri and the Finnish gold line is at an early stage but looks very likely to become very significant in the future.
The now operating gold-mines of LG have both been purchased from a small Swedish mining company that went into bankruptcy in 2007 (purchase was made with about $5M) - the bakruptcy was mainly due to management incompetence. The first mine, Pahtavaara, holds only about 75000 ounces of gold reserves today (at average grade 2.2g/t), but is open at depth and has potential in the surrounding region. Pathavaara will be running for at least three years and is estimated to give a good profit. The second mine, Blaiken, is estimated to produce 30,000 ounces a year, and has a resource of about 120,000 ounces gold at 3,6g/t, LG-management say that they see great potential here as this mine is also located on the gold line.
The mcap of LG is today about 600MKr, which is about $70M. I think if you compare this mcap with companies like the recently covered ITH, then it does not look too bad. LG has until now been financed mostly by equity-financing, but it isn't unlikely that they will be able to carry on with their main projects without further dilution or big loans as they have operating mines that will add a significant income, at least for a few years (and surely enough to cover the incredibly cheap purchase-price).
Ok, so what about NLG? The interesting thing about NLG is that they are the number one holder of LG-shares among publicly traded companies. The mcap of NLG is today no more than about $2M and they hold 2.5% of the LG shares. This means that the mcap of NLG is about the same as the value of their LG-shares... now, I don't have time to dig deeper into NLG today ... but that is an interesting fact.
To conclude, I really like LG, I don't know if this post really does fairness to the great potential of the Fäboliden project and its surroundings, if you want more information they have an english website. If you want to get in on LG and you don't want to buy shares on the Stockholm First North, then maybe Northern Lion on the TSX (or Frankfurt) is something for you.
completely unrelated:
February 20th, 2009
Petrominerales (TSX:PMG) and oil
Published on February 20th, 2009 @ 04:01:58 pm , using 554 words, 622 views
I used to hold this stock back in 06-07, when great results started coming in and the share did some great appreciation; however I kind of forgot about this company after I sold and now that the oil-price has all but crashed it might be interesting to do a little follow-up.
PMG is an out-growth from Petrobank (TSX PBG). The mcap is about CAD$800M. They are currently active in Colombia, and since recently, Peru; where the main-focus is on conventional oil, but also heavier types of oil (just like PBG). They hold vast areas of land with great potential in all oil-categories. At this time the heavy oil findings are not too relevant as they require a higher oil-price to be interesting, so I'll focus on their light oil production, but of course the heavy oil will hold a great leverage when oil starts moving up again.
The expansion of PMG has been a very quick one, from having produced practically nothing only recently, they're now producing about 25000 bopd (end of january 2009). The oil-bearing rock of the PMG lands is one with a very large amount of smaller oil-reservoirs. In the latest estimate the 3P reserves of PMG stand at about 52 mmbbls, which is worth almost $2B at an oil-price of $35. The trend is fairly clear here, PMG keeps drilling new wells all over the place and production keeps increasing strongly with reserves. The strategy of going after many smaller reservoirs in these areas of the world has proven very lucrative. Considering the large land-holdings that they have and the recently increased holdings in the region, it's hard to see a soon ending in the growth - the only thing that would slow it down is lower oil-prices.
It is far from unlikely that oil wouldn't be able to drop further, but either way the world will need oil and if prices drop then PMG will simply have to slow down production and exploration, I strongly doubt that they would go bankrupt or that they would be forced to sell holdings; but profitability might very well be depressed severely - although I guess that would only last for shorter periods of time, the world will pick up again in a couple of years and the demand for oil will be as good as ever. The profitability of the operations in PMG looks pretty good; for Q3 of 2008 the production cost was only $8.02 per barrel, which would leave a pretty good margin even if the oil-price would dive further.
So, is it a good idea to buy PMG today? I would say both yes and no. Oil might drop further and in the shorter term the SP could take a strong dive; in the future oil will move higher (we're probably talking years here) and in this time PMG might still keep growing in reserves and production so that the SP might stay somewhat stable and then kind of shoot of when oil begins to climb higher again. The appreciation of SP I guess would be strong and swift when oil turns up, so to be sure to be part of it you might want to buy in advance. Let's not forget that oil is a great protection against inflation and in comparison with gold, oil simply looks cheaper.
Remember peak-oil?
February 18th, 2009
International Tower Hill Mines (TSX-V:ITH) and the Gold-price
Published on February 18th, 2009 @ 23:34:34 , using 707 words, 819 views
ITH is a somewhat mature prospecting company with focus on North America. Mcap today stands at about CDN$130M (150M fully diluted). ITH has many highly interesting projects, but I will exclusively look at the Livengood project here, since it is the main factor for the share-price of ITH.
Livengood has seen exploration since the 1970's and was acquired by ITH (along with other projects) from Anglogold in 2006 by a 6M share issuance. Livengood today holds about 10M ounces of gold as indicated and inferred resources (and is still open for expansion), and this is at a very low cutoff grade of 0.3g/t (cutoff means that if recovery of gold is lower than 0.3g/t then it isn't economic), where the average grade is 0.64g/t (indicated) and 0.57g/t (inferred). This scenario is one of a very large heap-leach deposit, other scenarios are possible but give higher cutoff and therefore smaller resources. I don't know exacty how management comes up with this cutoff, but I would assume that they know what they're talking about. So basically, at todays gold-price this would be a very profitable operation, the only question then in order to know wether to buy or not is to look at the prospect for a long-term high gold-price. I beleive that the margins for this project will be very thin and this project could easily be suspended if gold drops.
The gold-price today is being pushed higher mainly from investment demand; things are crashing around us, nobody knows what's going to happen and there are worries both politcal and monetary. People are just interested in preserving wealth and so far gold has been excellent at doing this. I don't see any particularly strong signs of greed-driven price-appreciation today as the fundamentals continue to stay strong and there really isn't a light at the end of the tunnel yet.
What does this mean in terms of time? Well, just looking at what the governments of the world are doing and the fact that the people of the world are as clueless as the politicans are, these fundamentals for gold could very well last for perhaps as much as ten years ahead... maybe even more - because the only thing that could stop these 'fundamentals' is that the governements of the world stop trying to spend their way out of this mess and come to some real economic sense. The other alternative is that the politicans will screw everything up so badly that they will be forced to abandon the whole economic system and start anew - which alternative is better I really don't know.
So, we're looking at high gold-prices for a fairly long time ahead, and in the case of ITH I think we should be a little worried about moments in this gold-bull when things might look like they've cleared and people start pulling out like crazy from gold - this would greatly hurt an operation like Livengood. If the mcap of ITH is weighed to other companies in similar situations, it doesn't look too great; with such low grades it is a very risky thing to start up a huge operation. It is more common than not that a mining-operation is slightly overestimated in its profitability, and in this case an overestimation could easily prove fatal. But, I don't doubt that at todays prices the Livengood would be profitable and with these kind of margins it would also hold a very strong leverage if the price of gold were to go up - which isn't unlikely.
To sum it up, I think that ITH today represents more of a gambling-stock on the price of gold, if the price rises then the margins of Livengood would improve greatly and could give you a great leverage for gold. If gold drops, perhaps only for a while, the Livengood-operation could be in big trouble. Compared to other exploration-stocks you actually get a different type of leverage here, since they've already proven up a huge resource, unlike other exploration companies where they're still looking, and all they really got is hope - here you know what you get and if you beleive in price-appreciation for gold then this is pretty much a guaranteed great leverage.
February 17th, 2009
Millicom International Cellular (NasdaqGS: MICC, OMX:MIC)
Published on February 17th, 2009 @ 13:25:51 , using 546 words, 273 views
Millicom is mainly a provider of mobile-telephony in third world countries (in total 16 countries), with a revenue-growth of 30% in the fourth quarter, now has an mcap representing about a p/e of 10 for 2008 (46.72USD per share). They showed an impressive EBITDA-margin in the last quarter of 45%! They have a net debt of about $1.5B, which holds a 1:1 ratio to full-year EBITDA-profit. Steps haven been taken to avoid revenue-loss from swings in currencies, however q4 revenue was hurt by 3% from currency depreciation.
Today most of the growth in the company comes from africa where some countries have a growth of almost 100%, second is asia with growth rates of around 70%. Apparently growth is slowing down somewhat in central- and south america, but still at about 20-30% (being also the largest market for Millicom).
So, everything is looking pretty good so far; only trouble Millicom has really had is from countries that have taken the licence away and basically just shut the company out of the country, it's very hard for me to judge if this will happen again, but it definitely is somewhat of a wild card here. Other than this there are a bunch of other companies competing with Millicom, which in the long run should push down margins. And another 'problem' is that the impressive growth of Millicom has been created by constantly investing all the profit into new infrastructure, so dividends are not in the pipe-line for a long time I would guess.
The key here to be able to decide wether to buy or not is to know what the economic outlook really is for the countries where Millicom is active. If the global economy was no issue then Millicom would probably be valued at a p/e of 20 right now. Considering the great uncertainties of where we're headed, let's just see what the worst thing that could happen in these third-world countries really is.
The greatest danger lies in central- and south america, where the penetration of subscribers is alot higher than in other countries, where competition is harder and where the economies are much closer to the global economy and of course the US. Latin american economies are fairly dependent on production of natural-resources for export, so this would be a big problem if prices keep dropping. But, even if the exports basically come to a halt, people will still be wanting to call eachother... so, I suppose that maybe a drop of something like 50% of revenues here is not impossible, but it's a long way there and I think that if things start to get bad in these countries you will be able to pull out before any great losses would be had. In the other countries I would say that the greatest risk is actually political, and that's something that you simply can't predict.
To conclude, I think that Millicom is a great investment in these uncertain times - you get out of uncertain currencies, you get out of (historically) highly priced gold and you get out of the countries that can fall the hardest. It would take alot to bring down Millicom in these times, we shouldn't overlook the possibility of them being bought out either, this is something that was being discussed when they were valued much higher...